andieje
Hello

I am new to this forum so I hope I have posted this question in the right place.

I studied thermodynamics in the past but never really understood it and just used to the formulae to get the answers to pass exams. Now I am studying it again and I want to understand it this time.

I want to make sure from the start i have my basic definitions and understanding right.

To me, heat energy is thermal energy. heating is a mode of energy transfer. Molcules gain thermal energy which makes them vibrate and rotate. They can then collide into other molecules and transfer their heat energy.

But what is temperature in relation to thermal energy? I would really appreciate a simple intuitive explanation that I can them appy to equations.

Once i understand the relationship between heat energy and temperature I can then move on to entropy

many thanks
Hi,

Correct me if im wrong, but temperature is just the measure of change in energy of a system is it not? for eg, if two systems are placed together, so that the energy from one can flow into the other, then simply the temperature measured is just the flow of energy from one system to the other.This is not the 'amount' of energy that has moved in the system...

Edit #5, this question is a trap lol answer at your own risk of ridicule...
if a block of steel weighing 1 ton was at say 50 c temperature it would have a lot more thermal energy than say a teaspoon at 50c.
i think from my schooling the steel block has a heap of calories or the metric equivalent of heat energy
but the teaspoon at the same temperature will have minuscule heat energy
QUOTE (piersdad+Oct 7 2009, 06:30 PM)
if a block of steel weighing 1 ton was at say 50 c temperature it would have a lot more thermal energy than say a teaspoon at 50c.
i think from my schooling the steel block has a heap of calories or the metric equivalent of heat energy
but the teaspoon at the same temperature will have minuscule heat energy

You haven't really explained the OP's question though at all and if anything you have only added more questions.

Is anyone else going to give this one a shot?
rpenner
Assume there is a function of systems at equilibrium, which gives it's heat energy. So if X is a certain amount of substance in a certain equilibrium state, we have: E(X) as the total heat energy.

Obviously E(nX) = nE(X) where n is a multiplier -- or the total

Now the defining property of heat flow is it always flows from hot to cold. So if there is no heat flow, the systems must have the same temperature. This is the Zeroth Law.

Even though E(2X) > E(X), both 2X and X must be at the same temperature. T(nX) = T(X)

Now lets take two different items at different temperatures and put them in contact. E(X) and E(Y).
After a time, heat flow trickles to a stop and X reaches a new equilibrium state at a new temperature. X->X'. Likewise, Y->Y'. And the temperatures are the same. T(X') = T(Y'). But why that particular temperature?

For that, we need the Second Law of Thermodynamics, the one about entropy. Like energy, the amount of entropy of a substance in a particular state is proportional to the amount of the substance. So S(nX) = nS(X)

So T(X') = T(Y') because if significant amounts of energy would to flow from X' to Y' (or vice versa) the total entropy would decrease. So at this equilibrium temperature T(X') = T(Y') = t, only infinitesimal amounts of of energy can be exchanged, with no change of entropy. So a tiny change in the energy of X', ∂E(X') can flow to Y' and cause the oppose tiny change in engery, -∂E(Y'), only if the change in entropy is also equal and opposite, ∂S(X') = -∂S(Y').

So at a certain temperature, t, equal and opposite tiny changes to E produce equal and opposite changes in S.

So it follows, at this particular temperature, t, that ∂S(X')/∂E(X') = ∂S(Y')/∂E(Y'), and since this has to be true for any two substances, then ∂S(X')/∂E(X') = f(t). From just the zeroth law and the second law, we can't say what this function of temperature is f(t) is, but it has to be the same for all substances.

But we have no obvious meters that read S. And no meters, therefore that read ∂S or f(t). So it is up to physicists to make the world not only predictable, but simply predictable. So we will define the definitions in a way that makes the math simplest as possible.

By definition, ∂S(X)/∂E(X) = 1/T(X) -- and you can see this is hinted by the units. S is measured in Joules per Kelvin, and E in Joules.

Combining this with the First Law, we get ∂E(X) = T(X)∂S(X) - Work, which is just a a restatement of conservation of energy. For a gas, work might be Pressure × ∂Volume.
andieje
Hi

Since I posted this i found a really good simple explanation which i have posted below

Temperature is a number that is related to the average kinetic energy of the molecules of a substance. If temperature is measured in Kelvin degrees, then this number is directly proportional to the average kinetic energy of the molecules.

Heat is a measurement of the total energy in a substance. That total energy is made up of not only of the kinetic energies of the molecules of the substance, but total energy is also made up of the potential energies of the molecules.

When heat, (i. e., energy), goes into a substance one of two things can happen:

1. The substance can experience a raise in temperature. That is, the heat can be used to speed up the molecules of the substance. Since Kelvin temperature is directly proportional to the average kinetic energy of molecules in a substance, an factor increase in temperature causes an equal factor increase in the average kinetic energy of the molecules. And if the kinetic energy of the molecules increase, the speed of the molecules will increase, although these increases are not directly proportional. The kinetic energy of a body is proportional to the square of the speed of the body.

2. The substance can change state. For example, if the substance is ice, it can melt into water. Perhaps surprisingly, this change does not cause a raise in temperature. The moment before melting the average kinetic energy of the ice molecules is the same as the average kinetic energy of the water molecules a moment after melting. Although heat is absorbed by this change of state, the absorbed energy is not used to speed up the molecules. The energy is used to change the bonding between the molecules. Changing the manner in which the molecules bond to one another constitutes a change in potential energy. Heat comes in and there is an increase in the potential energy of the molecules. Their kinetic energy remains unchanged.

So, when heat comes into a substance, energy comes into a substance. That energy can be used to increase the kinetic energy of the molecules, which would cause an increase in temperature. Or that heat could be used to increase the potential energy of the molecules causing a change in state that is not accompanied by an increase in temperature.
rpenner
Right, so heat is the total stored kinetic and potential energy of the substance which is not proportional to temperature, but does go up when the temperature does. (But with phase transitions, sometimes the heat energy changes even though the temperature does not.)
Robittybob1
QUOTE (andieje+Oct 6 2009, 03:55 PM)
Hello

I am new to this forum so I hope I have posted this question in the right place.

I studied thermodynamics in the past but never really understood it and just used to the formulae to get the answers to pass exams. Now I am studying it again and I want to understand it this time.

I want to make sure from the start i have my basic definitions and understanding right.

To me, heat energy is thermal energy. heating is a mode of energy transfer. Molcules gain thermal energy which makes them vibrate and rotate. They can then collide into other molecules and transfer their heat energy.

But what is temperature in relation to thermal energy? I would really appreciate a simple intuitive explanation that I can them appy to equations.

Once i understand the relationship between heat energy and temperature I can then move on to entropy

many thanks

Good post.
Mekigal
QUOTE (rpenner+Oct 8 2009, 04:47 PM)
Assume there is a function of systems at equilibrium, which gives it's heat energy. So if X is a certain amount of substance in a certain equilibrium state, we have: E(X) as the total heat energy.

Obviously E(nX) = nE(X) where n is a multiplier -- or the total

Now the defining property of heat flow is it always flows from hot to cold. So if there is no heat flow, the systems must have the same temperature. This is the Zeroth Law.

Even though E(2X) > E(X), both 2X and X must be at the same temperature. T(nX) = T(X)

Now lets take two different items at different temperatures and put them in contact. E(X) and E(Y).
After a time, heat flow trickles to a stop and X reaches a new equilibrium state at a new temperature. X->X'. Likewise, Y->Y'. And the temperatures are the same. T(X') = T(Y'). But why that particular temperature?

For that, we need the Second Law of Thermodynamics, the one about entropy. Like energy, the amount of entropy of a substance in a particular state is proportional to the amount of the substance. So S(nX) = nS(X)

So T(X') = T(Y') because if significant amounts of energy would to flow from X' to Y' (or vice versa) the total entropy would decrease. So at this equilibrium temperature T(X') = T(Y') = t, only infinitesimal amounts of of energy can be exchanged, with no change of entropy. So a tiny change in the energy of X', ∂E(X') can flow to Y' and cause the oppose tiny change in engery, -∂E(Y'), only if the change in entropy is also equal and opposite, ∂S(X') = -∂S(Y').

So at a certain temperature, t, equal and opposite tiny changes to E produce equal and opposite changes in S.

So it follows, at this particular temperature, t, that ∂S(X')/∂E(X') = ∂S(Y')/∂E(Y'), and since this has to be true for any two substances, then ∂S(X')/∂E(X') = f(t). From just the zeroth law and the second law, we can't say what this function of temperature is f(t) is, but it has to be the same for all substances.

But we have no obvious meters that read S. And no meters, therefore that read ∂S or f(t). So it is up to physicists to make the world not only predictable, but simply predictable. So we will define the definitions in a way that makes the math simplest as possible.

By definition, ∂S(X)/∂E(X) = 1/T(X) -- and you can see this is hinted by the units. S is measured in Joules per Kelvin, and E in Joules.

Combining this with the First Law, we get ∂E(X) = T(X)∂S(X) - Work, which is just a a restatement of conservation of energy. For a gas, work might be Pressure × ∂Volume.

understood ... The tail end left me with a little doubt but achievable by potential possibly. Na the last part looks like speculation but a lot of that is true . I got it
Mekigal
QUOTE (Chaman+May 14 2013, 10:06 AM)
There is a fundamental difference between temperature and heat. Heat is the amount of energy in a system. The SI units for heat are Joules. A Joule is a Newton times a meter. A Newton is a kilogram-meter per second squared. Heat is transferred through radiation, conduction and convection. The amount that molecules are vibrating, rotating or moving is a direct function of the heat content. Energy is transported by conduction as molecules vibrate.

Yeah I am with you. Like pressure and volume . There are different states of heat You got radiant heat and forced motion heat in atmospheres . We say forced air where the air is heated and has lost capability of radiation to another object . Then Radiant heat don't heat the air it heats the object it strikes