It has been my decision to add the following earlier posts to this topic to converge and crystallize my thoughts into the beginnings of an theory of dimensions(non alternating), mass propagation particles/objects(Alternating wave) multi-verse entanglement of our universe

That's an very interesting post Metamars. It's just reminded me of some of my posts from a month ago that seem to have similarities. I have cut and pasted them from the Phys Orgs record of my posts. I have enlarged and emboldened the similar parts:

Some people last year ago may recall when my member name was chrisrivos i posted a formulae relating to the pace at what time was occurring to what we see in our telescopes as the beginnings of the big bang. As the Universe expands the graviton flux is less intense and thus meaning the density of space is less meaning what we see in our telescopes on earth of the big bang happening was a long time ago and a million years in then time is what we see now in one second through the telescope of the mythical center of origin. Furthermore it occurred to me just a short while ago and got gagged again. Is this! There were wild suggestions that the speed of light is slowing down compared to what it used to be! How figure? If gravitation can bend light there is a strong probability that when in the early universe it impeded it and as the Universe expands time will travel faster on Earth relative to the big bang and proportionately the speed of light will travel faster than in the gravitationally denser beginnings of the Universe.

Furthermore in relation to my above post the Doppler red shift seen in telescopes could possibly be a consequence of the fact that we are seeing light from galaxies that was emitted 13 billion years ago. At hat point in time the density of space (graviton flux) was greater and thus time and light traveled slower> meaning old galaxies look red because the spectral emissions were redder in those days and today we look in the telescope at petered out light The photons from 13billion years ago had a specific energy level and wont suddenly gain energy for our sake to see blue heavens. If scientists seen galaxies with a blue light Doppler shift the would think they are traveling inward and the Universe is collapsing, panic! Good god loll! The ends of universe loll

We understand that `The Duration of a second' today is a lot faster than it would have been a billion years. `In spite of the fact that living within either time point would seem the same to that person.'

However the Universe has been expanding from a Billion years ago and longer than that! And as the Universe expands the density of space lessens and the `Density of Space' defines the rate at `which time fly’s' in relation of region(1) compared to region(2) which may be a Billion years apart in terms of era within the expanding enclosed Universe.

The density of space gets bigger the closer you get to a black hole.

So if we think of region(2) in the parameters of (c,t,s)(region1) what are the corresponding parameters of (c,S,T,)(region2)

I have seen information on the Internet that E=mc^2 is wrong because the speed of light has been slowing down proportionately to expanding universe

Any thoughts?

March 26 2006 Thank you for your opinion Zephir however I’m not con-vincent!

I went and got a piece of paper and it took me less than 3 minutes to fiddle with the relativistic time and

Mass dilation's to arrive at a level of proportionality where the Lorenz bit cancels out. In five steps you have:

m/M=T/t where Uppercase letters are at relativistic velocity and lowercase are relative to rest on Earth.

And now would postulate that t on Earth today compared to a billion years ago T would relate to the ratio of `density of Space' {D,d} of the two periods thus

T/t = d/D where uppercase relates to the past and lowercase to the present!

I just hope I didn’t accidentally get something upside-down, it tricky assigning upper and lower cases from one formula to another.

And now I would postulate that t on Earth today compared to a billion years ago T would relate to the ratio of `density of Space' {D,d} of the two periods thus

T/t = d/D where uppercase relates to the past and lowercase to the present!

I understand your confusion as to what is what and when and the confusion stems from our natural instinctive perception that a lowercase character must be of a lesser value than an uppercase version of itself! This would be the effect if you looked at T/t along that perceptional line of thought.

Let me qualify both T and t are equal to the `duration of a second' and would be experienced/perceived in EXACTLY the same way by humans living in either era. However in the realm of an Expanding Universe I am trying to show how much faster time is flying denoted by T compared to a distant bygone era where the `Duration of a second is denoted t.

As the universe expands from start to finish the density of space lessens. So density of a region has gone from Denser: D{In the past} too a Less Dense d {In the present.

Now in the topic post I said I would resort to my own algebraic notation if I had to and I will in an attempt to make it simpler:

Let's tumble around the inverse proportionality a little bit and consider a different style of visual depiction: Everything above the lines is being divided by everything below the lines

t t t t t t t t t[Present] D{The Density of Space in a bygone era}

_________________ Is an equal ratio of _________________________________

T T T T T T [Past] d{The the less dense space of [Present]

Now look I have depicted [Present] time with 9 tee's and past with 6 Tee's this is analogous to the time dilation effects that would be perceived by an astronaut in a rocket traveling at relativistic velocities:

What velocity? well lets not get the next formulae confused but if a rocket basted of with our clocks ticking like tee's at some velocity his cock in the rocket would be ticking like the Tee's meaning that 9 second would have elapsed when he has only experienced 6 seconds and see that as right on his clock as well.

thus 6 = 9(1 - v^2/c^2)^(1/2)

then 6/9 =(1 - v^2/c^2)^(1/2)

then (6/9)^2 = (1 - v^2/c^)

then {1 - (6/9)^2} must = v^2/c^2

then (c^2){1 - (6/9)^2} = v^2

then [(c^2){1 - (6/9)^2}^(1/2) = v

then [c]{1 - (6/9)^2}^(1/2) = v

then [c]{(9-6)(9+6)/81}^(1/2) = v

then [c]{45/81}^(1/2) = v

then [c]{(45)^(1/2)}/9 = v

where (sqrt of 45 divided by 9) times c times 100% means 74.53% of c

Let c = 186282mps thus a relativistic velocity that would cause a time dilation on his rocket of 6/9 which is the same as 2/3 would be 74.53% of the speed of light!

v = 138846.4 miles per second.

Re- entering into well know equation T = t{1 - v^2/c^}^(1/2)

gives the answer 0.666666666 which is what 6/9 and 2/3 are!

His rocket would also have a mass 3/2 larger than when not moving

That’s what time dilation is all about.

What my theory is that a similar dilation also happens with the passage of time from the beginning (not as a result of velocity) but as a result of the Expanding Universe causing space to become less dense which means that 1 second at the dawn of time elapsing would be like an eternity for us now.

And any physicist wanting to plug hole into this from some angle remember what the universe could have been like in the beginning - and even along the lines of a mere black hole well even that has an event horizon where a whilst anyone a second near it would experience a second meanwhile we here on Earth would have near experienced an eternity before that above mentioned second elapsed.

Here's the quote from the start:

And now I would postulate that t on Earth today compared to a billion years ago T would relate to the ratio of `density of Space' {D, d} of the two periods thus

T/t = d/D where uppercase relates to the past and lowercase to the present!

I hope this was a better explanation of the theory I tried to express in yesterdays

post.

When I joined PhysOrg I expressed my theory that thing at points in time are often gravitationally/multidimentionally-trans-time less random that other points in time.

Furthermore In other posts I expressed that I’m 20 years plus familiar with seeing trans-time entangled phenomena that the conspicuous astronomical probabilities of unlikelihood don’t make me battet an eyelid of surprise.

Thus I would like to draw your cumulative insights of the following and the probability of that sequence:

In the above derivation I involved the measurement of Pie 6/9 meaning 2/3 in the above experimental equations.

An figure of 74.53 was obtained.

Interesting sideline when the diget’s are reversed and added they then equal 100. Look: 74 53 => 47 + 53 = 100!

**Explain that `You M’other Smucker's' **loll. At point in time from beginning to end some tings were/are less random that other points in time.